Carbon capture and storage
Reading time: 5 minutesTL;DR
If Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) was scalable and affordable the fossil fuel industry would have done it already.
It doesnât work at scale, itâs ridiculously expensive and a massive delay tactic. Itâs now used as an excuse to justify more fossil fuel expansion.
Currently only 0.12% of global carbon emissions are captured.
Explanation
Carbon capture and storage
Carbon capture and storage is the magic diet pill of the fossil fuel industry. The idea is as greenhouse gases are created, capture them and then store them somewhere - typically underground.
The problems with this is it is really hard and expensive to capture the carbon in the first place, and the locations where it is generated arenât always locations where you can store it. If you canât store it back underground within a reasonable distance then you need to transport it (burning more fossil fuels along the way).
Governments have wasted billions of dollars over the years subsidising research and efforts at CCS with projects like Chevronâs Gorgon project. This carbon capture project was a condition of approval of the gas plant in the first place, but amazingly the failure of it to capture the required volumes of carbon emissions has gone unpunished by Australian governments.
From 2023: Chevron expects the performance of its troubled seven-year attempt to bury carbon dioxide from its Gorgon gas export plant to dip in 2023 after a poor year when it only operated at one-third of its design capacity.
In this scenario the CCS is meant to capture carbon emissions from the extraction of fossil gas. The gas being extracted is liquified and exported, and then burnt elsewhere. So even if the CCS facility was working at full capacity it would only be negating the carbon emissions from getting the gas out. Like running a coal mine on solar panels, itâs kind of missing the bigger problem with the product being consumed.
Carbon capture utilisation and storage
The U in CCUS stands for utilisation. This is where the carbon emissions are captured but then used ⌠to extract more fossil fuels. The worst form of recycling, it typically involves pumping gas back underground to extract more oil that wasnât easily extracted the first time around. This is called Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR).
Because of the similarity in the acronyms, CCUS is an easy way to dupe people into thinking youâre doing good deeds with CCS (which is questionable in the first place) but really youâre just maximising the fossil fuels you can get out of the ground.
Challenges
Storing gas underground is pretty hard to do well - you need a large area in a geologically stable location to ensure itâs stored permanently. Thereâs no point storing gas in a cave in a highly earthquake prone location because a rupture may cause the gas to escape.
OK so what about transporting the gas to somewhere else? That could be done with a huge pipeline from the source to the storage. In 2020 a CO2 pipeline in America ruptured near the town of Satartia, Mississippi which messed a lot of people up with 45 hospitalised. CO2 is heavier than air and sinks to the ground which pushed out the oxygen in the town. Emergency vehicles than rushed to the scene just stopped as the engines had no oxygen to combust. Itâs a pretty messed up story and not a great idea to have heaps of these kind of pipelines running past humans because eventually all things fail.
Other ideas
There are technologies that can convert the CO2 into solid objects or materials that can be used in construction. MCI Carbon is an example of a company that uses mineral carbonisation. They have accelerated a natural process so we can more rapidly sequester carbon and I hope it scales and has a massive positive impact on reducing emissions. I think this form of carbon capture and utilisation is something to be supported as itâs not directly connected to fossil fuel projects or being used to justify their expansion.
Once again
Donât make me tap the sign that says âFocus more on reducing emissions in the first placeâ instead of chasing after them with problematic tech that promises more than it delivers.
Further reading
Gas giantâs $3.2b effort to bury carbon pollution is failing November 2022
Shellâs Massive Carbon Capture Plant Is Emitting More Than Itâs Capturing 2022
Water problems plague worldâs largest CCS project
Chevronâs information page about the project.
The U.S. is expanding CO2 pipelines. One poisoned town wants you to know its story September 2023
Go read the harrowing story of the worldâs first CO2 pipeline explosion August 2021
How do you store CO2 and what happens to it when you do? April 2020